On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:30:02PM +0100, Anonymous wrote: > oak-tree or a cypress? > > I'm talking about our routing tree... > what do you think about every node know a lot of others nodes instead of > only 100 or 50 (default value)? > > rtMaxNodes=300 > rtMaxRefs=150 > > or defaults? (both=50) We don't really know. The motivation for decreasing rtMaxRefs was to give new refs a chance - if there are too many refs per node, then new refs will be swamped and never do anything. The motivation for decreasing rtMaxNodes was rather dubious - an attempt to reduce the average hop time, which was ridiculous because with 120 threads we can only keep 48 connections open, so every single request was causing a connection restart. > > what is better in a big freenet? We don't know. We need to simulate. Volunteering? :) > > If everybody use a bigger routingtable, I think we need less htl to retrieve > a document. I'm not sure about that. >
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021127/9bbe4af9/attachment.pgp>
