the base question: >> rtMaxNodes=300 >> rtMaxRefs=150 >> >> or defaults? (both=50)
> We don't really know. The motivation for decreasing rtMaxRefs was to > give new refs a chance - if there are too many refs per node, then new > refs will be swamped and never do anything. The motivation for > decreasing rtMaxNodes was rather dubious - an attempt to reduce the > We don't know. We need to simulate. Volunteering? :) Yes, I do! (and hope many others!) I've lot of bandwith, and 512MB ram. my cpu is a P2at350, so it's always near 100% of cpu-usage. in freenet config I've put 300 as maxthreads. > average hop time, which was ridiculous because with 120 threads we can > only keep 48 connections open, so every single request was causing a > connection restart. mh, so with 300 threads I could do 228 connections? (300-72) is it enough? :) ps.: some days ago I tried to post a zip with my thread dump because a deadlock and you asked me to send it to you... do you received it or not?!? http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2002-November/002748.html If you want, I can upload it on freenet with FEC, as CHK at ... let me know. (zip= 30kB) regards. _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
