On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Why not use HTL=10? Many freesites are inserted at this HTL. Maybe even
> 15, for this particular application.
it was an experiment. People told me that HTL=5 would work, and since
HTL=5 is (a) less bandwidth intensive, (b) faster, and (c) well, i don't
remmeber, but i had another reason, I thought I'd try it. It wasn't
actully as bad as I expected.
Anyhow, the sample file recommends 10. it works much better.
- fish
p.s. I'm normally all for HTL overkill... hell, i still insert my
freesites at HTL=25 :-p
_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
