On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: > In message <20021026105710.GC392 at sporty.spiceworld>, Oskar Sandberg > <oskar at freenetproject.org> writes > > > > > >On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > >> > >>I think it is fair to report what the newest build is. The builds in the > >>development branch _are_ newer. > >> > >>The notice should not be intrusive though. > > > >That means we should probably loose the boldface. > > > > > > Rather more importantly: > > 1. you are advertising builds you presumably don't want users of the > release to use > > 2. your are advertising builds they won't get if they use the update > script, they will either get the same build they have or a new 5xx build > that will completely confuse them > > 3. and most conclusive, they will never be told about a new build in the > 5xx series that you *want* them to use > > Sorry, you are probably wrong here! I agree. I am chaning it to "stable build" and "latest stable" in the interface, and making NodeRef not increase the max seen for stuff over 600. > > > > > -- > Roger Hayter >
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021026/8875f802/attachment.pgp>
