On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:30, fish wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > > > When you have a minute (I realize that you are busy these days) could > > you elabourate on how encouraging low HTL requests in the network > > is silly. I would believe that the opposite is true and am curious what > > reasons you have to think the way you do. We already encourage lower > > HTLs by using the maxHTL setting in the configuration. > > because if you insert your streams/low traffic site at htl=5, they get > very difficult to retrieve :-p
Which comes back to the previous discussion about it being difficult to *maintain* a site at the required HTL depth. Somebody suggested using a 'skip the local node' flag, but from looking at the CVS, that only seems to be used by Fproxy's splitfile retrievel interface, and doesn't feature in the FCP protocol at all. cheers Chris _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
