On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:21:11AM +0200, Tuomas Lukinmaa wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >In both branches, connections on the private address ranges specified in > >RFC 1738 are now not subject to the bandwidth limiter. This will > >definitely go into 0.5.0.4. More sophisticated handling will be > >implemented if demand justifies it. > > It might be better to use IP TTL value for seperating local and I very much doubt that java gives us access to this; if necessary I will implement a user configurable list of IP address/netmask/bandwidth limiter settings. > non-local connections. Some networks use mixed private and normal > addresses together on WAN scale. Another good thing would be setting > larger send/receive buffers (SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUF) to allow larger > transfer windows to be used. Hmm. We have disabled nagle's algorithm, so it will not buffer anything at the OS level, right? What would stop it from transferring what we feed it in packets the size that we feed it, apart from the common limit of ~ 2kb, and the hard limit of 64kb for ip4? > > -tumu >
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021031/12ffc76d/attachment.pgp>
