-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 09 January 2003 04:34 pm, bdonlan wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2003 09:17 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > With the upcoming release of 0.5.1, and with the combination of ARKs and > > routing changes meaning that we will probably have a much greater > > proportion of new nodes permanent, it seems reasonable that we may need > > to increase the default maximum HTL. From a technical point of view, the > > only way to be sure that it was adopted would be to increase the last > > known good build to the version where we increased it... this would have > > much of the effect of a network reset, which could be a problem... we > > could increase it without trying to enforce it, but that would be messy > > in that some requests would get arbitrarily shortened just because they > > went through some old nodes... > > > > How should we handle this? Should we handle this? The longer we defer it > > the greater the impact on the network. > > I don't know how to actually determine it, but this looks like it'd be idea
I meant to say it'd be ideal for an anonymous stat gatherer, but my email client is acting up again. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Hewrx533NjVSos4RAuuKAJ9ORYKHTB1C8oYXJyM7uo/FktN1lgCePkQS +Gw8+GVvp43tL9caczXnacY= =dK3Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
