On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:59:23PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote: > On Tuesday 28 January 2003 21:41, you wrote: > > I am curious as to why only a percentage of the missing data blocks are > > healed (the default being a very small percentage)? > > Many hands make light work. > > I didn't think it would be necessary and I didn't want to annoy end users by > making them wait to a long time to *help* the network. > > In the current architecture healing is done at the end of requests. There is > no background healing queue, so the user has to wait for the healing to > finish before they get their file. One is planned though? It would be nice. It's really not hard to write an AutoBackoffNodeRequester-derived background insertion class... I can write a background insert-CHK-from-tempbucket-queue in something like an hour. The code is pretty well-tested. The only concern would be preventing the queue from overrunning the datastore... it's easy enough to limit the size of the queue and the size of the blocks relative to the datastore though. > > --gj > > > > > > Ian.
-- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org/amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/f5A5UAgXqMg/ ICTHUS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030130/0f44b53f/attachment.pgp>
