its not universally better to use a hardcoded datespecific link, its just clumbsily worded. perhaps it should be closer to somthing like: "this site could not be found, though there may be an older verion of the link available here:"
Ian Clarke wrote: >>Because it is extremely useful to the 0.01% who do to be able to get a >>bookmark for the site on a given date with all the links and images >>work? It could be phrased better, do you have any ideas on that? >> >> > >Well, if one type of link is clearly better than the other, then only >that one should be provided I guess. > >Ian. > > > -- ____________________________________________________ independent u.s. drum'n'bass -- http://vitriolix.com _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
