On 2003-03-14 01:56:21 -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > I have heard numerous reports that Freenet simply doesn't respect > bandwidth limits as specified by users. Has anyone experienced this > first-hand? It is a problem, many users are discouraged from using > Freenet as a result of this, for example, see: > http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=5497617&sid=56894 > > Ian.
I find the bandwidth limit acts as more like a suggestion. That is, you will get less traffic with a bandwidth limit, but still more than you specified. I've resorted to running CBQ so the traffic gets shaped at the OS level. I haven't run my node without CBQ for a while now, so things might be different now. -- Current soundtrack: 'Various Artists - Scooter Volume 1 - 01 - Apathy - Seriously Obsessed' Homepage: http://danky.com Get Freenet: http://groovy.danky.com:8891/aKCQDxt~V-k/ PGP Key: http://danky.com/keys/danello.pgp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 882 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030314/d9f1079a/attachment.pgp>
