On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Now that 0.5.1 is out... how should we do the CVS branches? Having > rel-0-5-1 for the "stable" branch seems silly... the most reasonable > path would seem to be to create a permanent "stable" branch... any > objections or comments?
Actually, CVS HATES parallel trees. The merges get really yucky really quickly. Branch off rel-0-5-1 and make 0.5.1.1 if need be. If you're used to the merge-and-tag, merge-and-tag cycle, you can do a seperate stable/unstable tree. Easier to just fork the unstable branch prior to release (into the next stable) and only commit bugfixes to that branch. --Dan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 155 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030325/c070dc0d/attachment.pgp>
