Ian Clarke (ian at locut.us) wrote: > (The other guy said:) > > Disk space is cheap, I don't see much reason for nodes not to cache > > everything they can get their hands on. > > Because then they won't specialise.
I know that specialization is critical to Freenet's routing heuristics right now. But data retention is also an issue to many of us. Data has to be reinserted into Freenet far more often than some of us would like. If it's at all possible, we'd greatly prefer to see a scheme that allows routing to work *without* decimating the content. -- Greg Wooledge | "Truth belongs to everybody." greg at wooledge.org | - The Red Hot Chili Peppers http://wooledge.org/~greg/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030329/ca363281/attachment.pgp>
