On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:50:01AM +0100, Niklas Bergh spake thusly: > >freenet 15628 0.0 71.1 656240 366232 pts/3 S 22:46 0:00 java > -server -Xmx384MB freenet.node.Main > > > >656M of RAM seems a tad excessive. > > Espacially since you have told the jvm to use a max of 384M.. How can > that be?
On the bright side, I am seeing some pretty impressive specialization on in the routing on my node which I have never noticed before: Histogram of keys in in fred's Routing table This count has nothing to do with keys in your datastore, these keys are used for routing May 7, 2003 1:38:51 AM keys: 852 scale factor: 0.4475524425506592 (This is used to keep lines < 64 characters) 0 |============= 1 |============ 2 |================= 3 |================= 4 |================= 5 |=========================== 6 |=============================================================== 7 |========================================================== 8 |=============================== 9 |============== a |===================== b |=========== c |============== d |===================== e |================ f |==================== peaks (count/mean) 0 --> (0.58215964) 2 --> (0.75117373) 6 --> (2.685446) a --> (0.90140843) d --> (0.9201878) f --> (0.86384976) Somewhat less specialization in the keys in my datastore though: Histogram of keys in in fred's data store These are the keys to the data in your node's local cache (DataStore) May 7, 2003 1:43:55 AM keys: 58212 scale factor: 0.013013419695198536 (This is used to keep lines < 64 characters) 0 |========================================== 1 |============================================ 2 |================================================ 3 |=========================================== 4 |========================================= 5 |============================================= 6 |================================================== 7 |=================================================== 8 |=============================================================== 9 |================================================== a |========================================== b |============================================== c |====================================================== d |============================================ e |============================================ f |========================================== peaks (count/mean) 2 --> (1.0172473) 8 --> (1.3517488) c --> (1.145056) e --> (0.94990724) Now, what does the first graph mean? Does that mean I am going to get a lot of "6" keys or that I know where to send them or what? I am still a bit unclear on what "keys in the routing table" means. The graphics visualizing the routing table is pretty slick btw. -- Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030507/c744382e/attachment.pgp>
