On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:57:21PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: > In message <1053286571WPQ.fvw at jareth.var.cx>, Frank v Waveren > <fvw+freenet at stack.nl> writes > >On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:31:58PM +0300, Jukka Holappa wrote: > >>Does this mean that when other people send announces, my node dies? I > >>don't like that. > >Fred was never designed to be memory-limited as far as I can tell > >(though it does try to cut back on threads when it hits problems), you > >shouldn't consider telling the JVM that it can only have so much > >memory as a way of limiting fred's memory usage, but more of a "I > >don't want fred to spin out of control and make my entire system > >unusable, stop it if it tries to use more than this". > > > My nodes (596 & 6037) produce out of memory errors when they have only > allocated themselves half the available memory and carry on working fine > afterwards. Maybe it is the particular error which causes the problem > rather than lack of memory.
That is most likely due to them trying to create a new thread when the system doesn't want to give them one. > -- > Roger Hayter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030519/98ef82de/attachment.pgp>
