On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:45:02AM +0200, Frank v Waveren wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: > > >Also, does Fred check for reserved address ranges? It seems this would > > >be able to rule out most publicly inaccessible interfaces. > > That I know it does :) > Not all of them apparantly, 5.0.0.0/8 is marked IANA RESERVED.
We check for local and LAN-only addresses currently. One might make an argument for checking for "reserved" addresses, and multicast-reserved addresses, but what we have now is normally sufficient. > > -- > Frank v Waveren Fingerprint: 21A7 C7F3 > fvw@[var.cx|stack.nl|chello.nl] ICQ#10074100 1FF3 47FF 545C CB53 > Public key: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net/fvw at var.cx 7BD9 09C0 3AC1 6DF2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030528/1d5efbe6/attachment.pgp>
