Well, we've had 2 million downloads over the project's lifetime, of say 3MB each, which is 6 terabytes. I suppose over that period it wouldn't be such a big deal, but on peak it might be - if the gentoo script checks it out from CVS, then around a major release (ours or gentoo's), we might end up using a significant amount of bandwidth.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 04:19:43PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2005, at 15:36, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > >On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 08:06:35PM -0400, Juiceman wrote: > > > >>I noticed there haven't been any new snaphots since the 13th. There > >>should at least be new seednodes being generated, right? > >> > >>Would it be possible to put up a daily contrib.source.tar.bz2 ? > >>There > >>is one up there from July 2004. > >> > > > >It appears that the reason for the snapshots not being updated is > >sourceforge suckage. > > > >Does anyone have any recommendations? The problem with running our own > >CVS (or whatever) server is that it might take up a significant amount > >of bandwidth if anonymous CVS is used much (e.g. by gentoo). > > Well, how much bandwidth are we talking about? I think dodo has > about 15GB per month. I find it hard to believe that running a > subversion server could take up that much bandwidth unless gentoo are > doing something really crazy. > > Ian. > -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20050922/f5cab67e/attachment.pgp>
