Looks good IMHO.
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 10:16:19AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 3 Apr 2006, at 09:37, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >What's your response? It does seem rather triumphalist > >- "Initially > >Freenet 0.7 will be a "pure darknet" model" - this seems to suggest > >that > >0.7 is ready... we have a long way to go yet, 0.7-a1 is not secure, > >and > >this must be made clear... I have modified it slightly. > > I don't infer from that statement that Freenet 0.7 is ready, but I do > agree that we should place more emphasis on the fact that it is an > alpha. > > I have made some further changes to the release to this effect, > please comment. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060403/2e29219d/attachment.pgp>
