Nice one! I agree it should be per neighbour, lets say one ping per 5 seconds per neighbour...
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:51:54AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Since I have 23 active > > connections, most of which will have relatively few connections, it is > > quite possible that they would send me relatively many FNPLinkPing's per > > second... > > This could be used to estimate how many of a neighbour's other > neighbours are online - should the limit be per neighbour instead? > > Cheers, > Michael -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060407/a502d9bb/attachment.pgp>
