On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 10:16:26AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 17 Aug 2006, at 09:58, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > >>I don't believe that the darknet and opennet will be weakly connected > >>as you suggest, but neither of us can no for sure until we see it. > > > >We can know for near certain that darknets operating in hostile > >environments will be weakly connected to the opennet, and probably to > >other darknets too, for the simple reason that they CANNOT use > >opennet. > > No, but they can be connected to peers outside the hostile > environment that can be promiscuous.
Sure, but the hope is that there will be several very large (thousands of nodes) chinese/iranian/etc darknets, which would have to have relatively few "uplink" nodes, not just hundreds of ten node ones. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060817/e31164bc/attachment.pgp>
