On Wednesday 26 July 2006 23:17 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Can this be combined with SecurityManager settings to deny the plugin
> access to the local disk etc unless explicitly granted? If so then it
> seems reasonable.
I think that is possible. I will check out how easy security managers
and access control mechanisms are to use.
> Note that a plugin may be able to gather information about the user
> and return it to its author in any case; this only requires the
> ability to request and insert keys and the ability to read the clock.
Sure. Access to any privilege should not be given lightly. The user
should be informed about what read and write access to freenet might
mean.
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060726/ba274631/attachment.pgp>
