On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:10:21 +0200, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Jusa Saari <jargonautti at hotmail.com> > [2006-06-21 00:38:45]: > >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:21:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> > All unmaintained CSS styles for the node will be deleted in the near >> > future. If you want your favourite theme to remain in Fred, please >> > could you respond to this thread volunteering to be a maintainer. From >> > time to time new features require new CSS elements (such as the recent >> > addition of the progress bar on the queue page); this is the main duty >> > of a style maintainer. >> >> Speaking of CSS styles, there's two problems with them: >> >> 1) The Node Configuration page, where you can change the style, lists >> the available styles but forces the user to write the name of the >> desired one. Why ? Why not put them into a nice combobox or something ? > > Because it would involve MAJOR code refactoring for the only configuration > option we can enumerate.
I find this comment rather strange. If the list is shown in the HTML page, then surely it wouldn't be a problem changing that HTML code a little to put it into a compobox ? Or are you saying that the list is hardcoded into the HTML code (in which case it could still be easily put to a box) ? >> 2) The "Boxed" style does not show this list. Bad thing if the user >> wants to change away from it but does not remember the names of other >> styles. The same goes for the style "Sky". > > Complain to the new maintainer of the boxed style :p :) I have no reason to complain, I mostly use Frost and looked at styles just for fun when I read the OP of this thread.
