I don't want to have to set up email filtering to pull out Freenet 
related email on all the different email clients I use to read this list 
(5, including a mobile phone and an ISP provided web client, neither of 
which can perform this filtering even if I could be bothered). Am I 
unusually lazy?

-- jeek

cruise wrote:
> Actually, it seems to me the consensus is "It isn't hurting me to have 
> it."
>
> Which isn't the point at all - would it hurt me to /not/ have it is 
> the question - since it's presence could well be affecting others.
>
> Assuming the tagging is the default, and trying to find reasons not to 
> is the wrong direction. Can anyone suggest a good reason to actually 
> have it?
>
> Thus spake Ian Clarke...
>> Ok, I guess the consensus is that we shouldn't change.
>>
>> Ian.
>>
>> On 5/3/06, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) <nextgens at freenetproject.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> * Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> [2006-05-03 16:38:25]:
>>>
>>> > The point is that there is no point.  They take up space without
>>> > serving any useful purpose.  This is a particular problem for those
>>> > with limited-width mail readers such as Mutt or Pine.
>>> >
>>> > Ian.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I'm using mutt and honestly don't mind/haven't seen any problem.
>>>
>>> NextGen$
>>>
>>>
>>> > On 3 May 2006, at 16:17, John C.C.White wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >OK. I'll disagree:
>>> > >
>>> > >- the list is low-volume
>>> > >- Subject: headers rarely overflow my (entirely reasonable) space
>>> > >allocated
>>> > >- I haven't seen any bogus [freenet-devl] messages (yet).
>>> > >
>>> > >Really, what's the point/need?
>>> > >
>>> > >-John-
>>> > >
>>> > >On May 3, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Ian Clarke wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>This makes a pretty persuasive argument for ditching the [freenet-
>>> > >>devl] subject tags on mailing list emails:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>  http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/
>>> > >>
>>> > >>If nobody can come up with a good argument against this, I suggest
>>> > >>we follow its advice and remove the Subject tags.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Ian.
>>> > >>_______________________________________________
>>> > >>Devl mailing list
>>> > >>Devl at freenetproject.org
>>> > >>http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>> > >
>>> > >_______________________________________________
>>> > >Devl mailing list
>>> > >Devl at freenetproject.org
>>> > >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Devl mailing list
>>> > Devl at freenetproject.org
>>> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devl mailing list
>>> Devl at freenetproject.org
>>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devl mailing list
>> Devl at freenetproject.org
>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> Devl at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl


Reply via email to