On 5/13/06, Caco Patane <cacopatane at gmail.com> wrote: > What about SHUTDOWN in capital letters, and if it's entered normally a > warning that it should be on capital letters? > > Is there any CAPS LOCK fan? > > Saludos, > Caco_Patane <!> > > On 5/12/06, David Sowder (Zothar) <freenet-devl at david.sowder.com> wrote: > > Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Quite frankly to have an application stopped by the same command that > > > stops your OS > > > is dangerious. Over the years I have been bitten by this sort of buglet > > > a few times... > > > > > Mind you, I've only checked MS Windows XP, Mac OS X and Debian Linux > > (many share the same program though I believe), I haven't found a common > > OS that shuts down by issuing a "shutdown" command with no arguments. > > Perhaps you could fill me in? What would you suggest instead of > > "shutdown" considering that it's the most obvious and "quit" is the most > > common for what it does? > > > On Friday 12 May 2006 09:18, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > > > > > >> Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > >> > > >>> HI > > >>> > > >>> Please revert this. > > >>> > > >>> its OK that quit exits in TCMI. Its not a problem. Its a good thing. > > >>> > > >>> This fix just confuses things. > > >>> > > >>> Its not a good idea. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> And I would argue the opposite. QUIT should not mean different things > > >> in different contexts if we can easily help it. Different meanings > > >> leads to use out of habit giving you a result you didn't expect, in this > > >> case it would be node shutdown. Imagine using the socket interface a > > >> lot and then using the direct console for some reason, typing QUIT and > > >> going to lunch; your node would be shutdown unintentionally until you > > >> noticed at some point. Obviously, this is up for discussion in the > > >> group, but I'm unclear how this change confuses anything. > > >> > > >> Admittedly, QUIT used to be the command to shutdown in either > > >> environment, but that was changed a couple of weeks ago and I believe > > >> the current arrangement is much more logical and consistent with other > > >> applications. > > >> > > >>> On Thursday 11 May 2006 22:43, zothar at freenetproject.org wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> Author: zothar > > >>>> Date: 2006-05-12 02:43:18 +0000 (Fri, 12 May 2006) > > >>>> New Revision: 8672 > > >>>> > > >>>> Modified: > > >>>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Node.java > > >>>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/TextModeClientInterface.java > > >>>> Log: > > >>>> This should make a few interface elements more consistent: 'QUIT' just > > >>>> plain isn't a command in direct TMCI console mode rather than having a > > >>>> different meaning there than on a network socket, display the running > > >>>> node's build number and SVN revision number consistently everywhere > > >>>> (and now also in the logs on start up). > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ > > Devl mailing list > > Devl at freenetproject.org > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > > > > > -- > And the void rumbles in > Like an underground train > Forever comes closer > The world is in pain > We all must be shown, we must realise > That everyone changes and everything dies > > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.12 > GIT dpu s:-- a-- C++ UL+++ P-- L++ E--- W+++ N o-- K- w--- > O---- M V- PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP t+ 5-- X+ R+++ tv-- b++ DI-- D++ > G++ e h+ r-- y** > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
In all my years on *nix I've never seen any distribution that shut down on just plain shitdown, it always needed -h now too.
