* JS Percival <Mail at nibblycarrot.fsnet.co.uk> [2006-05-16 04:24:46]:

> >Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> >>On Monday 15 May 2006 10:27, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:09:51PM +0200, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Saturday 13 May 2006 10:04, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>exit?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>I would like that much better.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>So EXIT would close the socket and QUIT would shutdown the node?  Or 
> >>>>>the other way around?
> >>>>>
> >>>>if it's supposed to shut down the node, use SHUTDOWN (like in *nix to 
> >>>>bring something completely down)
> >>>>to close the socket use EXIT (like sh/dosshell) or QUIT (like 95% of 
> >>>>programs)
> >>>>
> >>>>what's the problem? :)
> >>>>0,02EUR
> >>>>
> >>>shutdown might end up being typed on the console? I suppose that's not a
> >>>real problem as shutdown on its own won't bring the system down, even if
> >>>the user is root.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Freenet uses java.  So the above depends on the OS.  For instance, 
> >>shutdown alone is
> >>enought to stop an IBM VM based os (which does run java...)
> >>
> >So don't run Freenet "as root". :)
> >
> >Honestly, it looks to me like the "QUIT closes the socket, SHUTDOWN takes 
> >down the node" approach is favored by most who have spoken, but then I 
> >favor this myself.
> >
> >
> >Should we put this to an informal vote?
> >
> >Candidate A: "EXIT closes the socket, QUIT takes down the node"
> >Candidate B: "QUIT closes the socket, SHUTDOWN takes down the node"
> 
> For what it's worth, I vote SHUTDOWN for taking down the node.
> EXIT and QUIT are both common for closing a console/connection, so allow 
> either for closing the socket.
> 

If my point has any kind of importance : 

        1) I don't CARE what you choose as long as it's not gonna change
        every 20 commits ;)
        2) I don't think it's important as TMCI is NOT going to be
        enabled by default on .7-release.
        3) I'm fed up with following this thread : only power users are
        using TCMI and most of them are egocentric, using a different
        environement : you won't ever agree alltogether.

NextGen$
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060516/09a3297e/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to