Since we are in a state of alpha, why not keep lastGoodBuild fairly
recent? Maybe a window of 15 node versions? The people that are
running this at this early stage surely don't mind updating their
nodes every 2 weeks or so, and throwing out the few older nodes that
aren't getting updated might make troubleshooting the network a bit
easier...
On 5/17/06, toad at freenetproject.org <toad at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> Author: toad
> Date: 2006-05-17 16:45:10 +0000 (Wed, 17 May 2006)
> New Revision: 8745
>
> Modified:
> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java
> Log:
> 717: Up minimum build to 698. (minor incompatible change in that build in
> on-network ip address detection; flush out old nodes with really old bugs
> too!)
>
> Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java 2006-05-17 15:21:37 UTC (rev
> 8744)
> +++ trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/Version.java 2006-05-17 16:45:10 UTC (rev
> 8745)
> @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
> public static final String protocolVersion = "1.0";
>
> /** The build number of the current revision */
> - private static final int buildNumber = 716;
> + private static final int buildNumber = 717;
>
> /** Oldest build of Fred we will talk to */
> - private static final int lastGoodBuild = 591;
> + private static final int lastGoodBuild = 698;
>
> public static final int buildNumber() {
> return buildNumber;
>
> _______________________________________________
> cvs mailing list
> cvs at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
>
--
I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
