On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:32:44PM +0200, freenetwork at web.de wrote: > >> High level question: Why is it necessary to support several =20 > >> compression standards? > > > >I'm not sure either that it is a good idea. > > > >NextGen$ > > I think we should only support ONE compression scheme. It should be fairly > STANDARD, read: _100%_ of other languages (c, cpp, cs, php, perl, lisp, > whatever) should have a library for this codec. It does not need to have the > best compression ratio, a fairly good is good > enough. it should be somewhat speedy and nice to CPU and RAM resources.
Why? -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060519/2dcfa463/attachment.pgp>
