Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > You're basically saying that the workaround doesn't work for you, and > you're suggesting that we remove the watchdog in order to let YOUR node > harm the network, that's it ?
I think he's saying that when the workaround is activated, the watchdog should be deactivated. That makes sense to me. > due to the real problem and the non-working workaround. Are you sure the workaround isn't working? It sounds like the watchdog might be restarting his node because of CPU starvation, not deadlock. Cheers, Michael
