On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:13:12PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > Our original assumption was that doing Freenet entirely with threads > would be excessively resource intensive - this may or may not be true. > > If it is true, there are a few new continuations libraries around > that I want to take note of: > > http://jauvm.blogspot.com/
We cannot depend on a non-standard JVM. And according to the Aug 31 update it has some serious issues! > and... > > http://rifers.org/blogs/gbevin/2005/9/23/announcing_rifecontinuations Excellent!! This is the preferred solution. We may however want to defer using continuations to 0.8 or even 0.9; it depends whether we have practical performance problems. Certainly I have seen OOM: cannot create thread, although I have no idea why; after a dump later on there were very few threads running. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060501/24a1813d/attachment.pgp>
