On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 02:26:38PM +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * bbackde at googlemail.com <bbackde at googlemail.com> [2007-04-12 14:06:28]: > > > I looked over your source, but where is the point when the node READS > > the file written by the client? It looks like the readFile is created > > by the node? > > > > Did I misunderstand this? > > Yes, "known issue" ... in the final version of the protocol the client > will choose the filename and the node will return if it can read from > it or not (assuming the file isn't empty).
Why would the filename be created by the client? I thought the protocol was that the node writes a file which the client must read, then it tells the client to write a specific block of data to a specific file which the client must create. I will review the code soon, today. > > I don't know if the node ought to prove it to the client (returning a > salted hash of the content for instance) or not. > > Any views on the topic ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070412/20203c68/attachment.pgp>
