Would this make the setup process less user-friendly? Is it worth it anyway?
----- Anonymous ----- 2007.10.28 - 23:43:22GMT ----- I suggest setting the default storage to 5GB and putting a real big warning in the installation process telling the user something like "The store is only 5GB by default becuse Freenet needs to be able to run on really OLD machines: you should set this value to 25GB or more, trying to aim for several hundreds GB" Insisting a bit more about this point on the website, wiki, faq, etc., would also be a good idea. This would considerably extend the average life of not-hugely-popular files. ----- toad at zceUWxlSaHLmvEMnbr4RHnVfehA ----- 2007.12.03 - 15:26:13GMT ----- Would it make it more obvious if we changed it from a dropdown box to a series of radio buttons? So you don't need to click on it to see that you can make it much bigger? ----- cptn_insano at _g2YxqIynCrs2bcwLGQkr+0b544 ----- 2007.12.03 - 17:23:29GMT ----- Just don't give it a default so the user has to pick something. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071203/225bc51a/attachment.pgp>
