* Jack O'Lantern <jolantern60 at yahoo.com> [2007-12-07 10:51:46]: > --- Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > Are you planning on maintaining the unstable branch (0.6) ? If so, > > why? We deprecated it, is there any good reason to revive it? > > The differences between stable and unstable are very small (try diff > -ruwB -x .svn stable/ unstable/, that returns only few dozen K of > differences, about half of which are unimportant).
That's a good reason to focus on .5 ;) > The thing is that > every commit to stable triggers the auto-builder and on the official > download page you get something which claims to be 5108 but is really > halfway through to 5109. I'm not convinced that back-porting my scripts to the .5 tree (auto-release gets triggered only when me or toad change the version string in Version.java) is worth it... So we will KISS: - Forget about .6 - I've disabled the auto-builder so that you can commit/do whatever needs to be done without breaking everyone's node - You will have to ping me (possibly off-list as it doesn't concern the *current* version of freenet) when you want a build to be released. > So I thought I'd use unstable for regular > committing and stable only when a new build is due. I'm aware that this > is not the most efficient way to handle this problem and I'd be glad if > you would be willing to offer me a better solution. > Please don't assume things in the future, just tell me what you want to do and I'll do what is needed server-side :) NextGen$ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071207/8b36201b/attachment.pgp>
