On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Yeah, it seems like the swapping/routing is presently the best it has >> been thus far; but I do think the 0% store hit the Ed mentions may be >> a factor in freenet's slowness. I see that in my nodes as well. > > Don't you think it simply means that Freenet is mostly being used for > short-term storage i.e. fetching popular/recently inserted content?
No, and that I am only able to fetch content with some degree of recentness (e.g. looking up an old ssk-version of a site fails), to me indicates that at present freenet can *only* be used for short-term storage at present. Or more specifically, that the store implementation (most likely with regards to routing) is broken. -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071210/a9feb6cd/attachment.html>
