* Robert Hailey <freenet-devl at osndok.com> [2007-01-08 12:42:06]: Hi!
> Please excuse me if this has already been addressed, I'm just now > starting to dig into the freenet source. > > The encryption aspect interests me, but after writing a test program > and testing various key/block sizes for Rijndael, I found that only > the 128 bit block size appears to work as it stands in the SVN > repository, yet everywhere that it is used in the rest of the source > it is requested with a 256 blocksize. > > Apparently only due to not passing the blocksize into the key/encrypt/ > decrypt functions, it appears easy enough to fix (example patch > included). My question is, why aren't these other classes which rely > on Rijndael-256-block encryption broken? or are they, silently? They were broken silently :S Congratulation for catching that bug. > > If I'm missing something obvious, please do tell. You are not ; we have been. NextGen$ > -- > Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070109/20c880ef/attachment.pgp>
