Thus spake David Sowder... > Matthew Toseland wrote: >> On Monday 11 June 2007 18:14, David Sowder wrote: >> >>> Matthew Toseland wrote: >>> >>>> Is this necessary? >>>> >>> Yes. I managed to create a bookmark I couldn't manage later. It >>> contained a "&" character. >>> >> I don't understand why. Anything that goes through HTMLNode is automatically >> HTMLEncode'd.
Because & is technically not an illegal HTML character? XHTML, yes. Besides which, the HTML encoding for an ampersand (&) is very different from the URL encoding (%26). > Yeah, I noticed, but when I tried using HTMLEncoder rather than > URLEncoder, it didn't fix the problem, so maybe that's why the auto > thing didn't handle it.
