On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:56:19PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Don't we _want_ the networks to be bridged? > > Not at present - a few links between two mature networks (which is what > I mean by bridging, sorry if that's the wrong terminology) would break > things pretty badly I believe. The bridge nodes would be little better > than black holes. > > > I agree that long term we will need to be able to identify that two > > networks are not strongly connected, and treat them as separate > > networks, only escaping to the second network if we can't find what we > > want on the first ... But that's a long way off. > > Fair enough, I'm not trying to push for it, just brainstorming about > advantages and disadvantages of different darknet architectures.
We should support it sure, but it's lower priority than opennet. Start a wiki page if you want. :) > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20070503/59db558b/attachment.pgp>
