On Monday 19 November 2007 15:16, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-11-19 14:26:50]: > > > Not good. It might not be called <uri>/activelink.png. It should be separate, > > and optional, like in 0.5. > > Well, I see the point of making it optional... but I don't see the > point of allowing people to rename it. It should be a convention, just > like their size is... IMHO People maintaining indexes should enforce it too.
Well, if it's optional, we will have to track that information per-bookmark, and we may as well have a URL as well. That was the thinking in 0.5 iirc. We should at the very least make it optional. Broken images on the frontpage are BAD. > > NextGen$ > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071119/0cd09c91/attachment.pgp>
