Conferences on Hawaii are of course known for their hard science and not at all being about paying for a vacation with your research funds...
// oskar Matthew Toseland wrote: > Here's another improving-0.5 paper, which I don't entirely understand as it > doesn't seem to fully specify the algorithms tested, although it claims > impressive gains in path length. It's all ultimately derived from the > observation that freenet improves much less quickly if there are many > requests and few inserts than if there are equal numbers. > > http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/09/2056toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265683 > > On Thursday 22 November 2007 11:03, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Looks like a combination of some variant on NGR (vivee has done research >> suggesting something like NGR could work), and Bloom filters. Both ideas are >> old, but they probably have some new variant on them. They claim a 30x >> increase in hits ratio and 6x transfer rate. >> >> Bloom filters aren't that difficult, the problem is that we can't implement >> them prior to premix routing and still have any realistic anonymity against >> local attackers. Maybe the paper's "fuzzy" proposal helps. >> >> Anyway, I haven't actually bought/read the article yet. >> >> > http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/ccgrid/2006/2585/02/2585toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/CCGRID.2006.136
