On Saturday 29 September 2007 22:37, you wrote: > * Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2007-09-29 21:26:53]: > > > Arguably this should occur on a separate thread. > > The signature might take some time, yes... but that code should be > triggered only once every 30 mins.
We should still run it on a separate thread. If we run it on the same thread then we have to deal with locking i.e. we don't want to do the expensive operation more than once in parallel, as well as it increasing latency significantly during that period. > > > > On Saturday 29 September 2007 19:13, you wrote: > > > Author: nextgens > > > Date: 2007-09-29 18:13:44 +0000 (Sat, 29 Sep 2007) > > > New Revision: 15390 > > > > > > Modified: > > > branches/freenet-jfk/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java > > > Log: > > > Renew DH parameters every 30mins > > > > > > Modified: branches/freenet-jfk/src/freenet/node/FNPPacketMangler.java > > > =================================================================== -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20071017/d209482e/attachment.pgp>
