David ?Bombe? Roden wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:31 +0100, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > >> I don't... Keep in mind that FCP is insecure by design... >> > > Now you're the second person reminding me of that. Please, PLEASE tell > why an FCP client should be allowed to request illegal material but not > to create a new key pair? Or sign a message with a previously generated > key? > > I'm seriously wondering what people think I am suggesting here. Maybe > you can elaborate on that. >
The node providing crypto funtionality via FCP could be very useful. As for it being insecure, perhaps we could add support for FCP over SSL on a separate port.
