> Once again suggestions would have been welcome when the protocol was
> designed... not now that it becomes mandatory.
I think that you cannot expect everybody to follow the development as it goes
necesserily.
bback has noticed something that he didn't like and he's letting you know that
there is a
better way, it doesn't mean that he's trying to undermine the progress or
anything.
> By the way, you can "try" to send something without TestDDA ... and if
> the node returns a ProtocolError with the DDA-reserved code then assume
> it has to be done.
Sort of like programming in Java through Exceptions rather than get-methods...
> NextGen$
Free your mind and seek the truth.
- Volodya
--
http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki
http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum
"None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
