* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-04-28 17:08:15]:
> On Monday 28 April 2008 16:18, Florent Daigni?re wrote: > > * toad at freenetproject.org <toad at freenetproject.org> [2008-04-28 > > 14:28:50]: > > > > > Author: toad > > > Date: 2008-04-28 14:28:49 +0000 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008) > > > New Revision: 19582 > > > > > > Modified: > > > trunk/freenet/src/freenet/clients/http/FirstTimeWizardToadlet.java > > > Log: > > > Change default to assume that we're on 256kbps. > > > > > > > Huh ? > > > > What has changed since we agreed on using 128kbps ? > > > > That will significantly impair the performances and general browsing > > experience of users using a slower link! > > And significantly increase performance for users using at least a 256kbps > link. Optimise the common case! However, we should probably reduce the actual > limits to half the specified upload speed, i.e. from 24 to 16 for 256kbps. > How so? Last time I checked my node didn't use even a quarter of the alloted bandwidth > Exactly how common are broadband connections with less than 256kbps upstream? > Anyone got one? I had one for years; my parents still have one iirc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080428/2ff43ac3/attachment.pgp>