On Monday 11 August 2008 05:04, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > > On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:57, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > >> Matthew Toseland a ?crit : > >> > >>> (most everything is available through Node). Alternatively, we could add a > >>> method on HighLevelSimpleClient to do this for you - you'd feed it a > >>> FetchContext and a ClientCallback ... Added the necessary method in SVN > >>> r21572. > >> I' also going to need non-blocking inserts. Can you do something about it ? > > > > Done in 21627. > > > > Neither this nor the non-blocking fetch code is tested, it's possible there's > > some wierd bug, let me know if you need me to debug it (make me a simple test > > case). > > Both methods are tested and looks perfect, thanks again. > > I've got a question about requests persistence. I've set mines to > 'forever', but does 'forever' really mean 'forever' for the node ? > > Is it safe to restart all the requests at plugin startup ? This is for > the case where a user starts a new node but still has his WoT database...
Set them to reboot. Forever means they are persistent across restarts. Reboot means they are not. Connection means they are tied to a specific FCP connection. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080811/c3e33131/attachment.pgp>
