On Jan 11, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> I'm thinking that the SEND_TIMEOUT will need to be increased, I >> really >> am not familiar with what the average network condition will be like. >> Feel free to change the SEND_TIMEOUTs to your liking. > > IMHO it should be equal to ACCEPTED_TIMEOUT. Although with message > prioritisation I'm not sure conditionalSend does anything useful?
I agree, and have reverted r16959 in r17006. With message prioritization, the marginal utility it *might* provide in extreme cases will both (1) be quickly detected with the standard backoff/routing, and (2) not be worth the increased code complexity. -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080111/c1751b14/attachment.html>
