On Friday 11 January 2008 21:22, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Are you interested in implementing message priorities? MessageItem and > > PacketSender are the most relevant classes. > > I'll certainly do the grunt work of putting in the priority constants > and accessors in (r17019), but I kinda don't want to touch > FNPPacketMangler/PacketSender.
It's really not hard (look at the middle of PacketSender.run(), where it calculates the deadlines), but if you don't want to do it I will. > > Also, the packet acknowledgements appear to be a lower level than the > message queue. True. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080112/b242a12e/attachment.pgp>
