On Saturday 12 January 2008 00:20, Robert Hailey wrote:
> 
> On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Robert Hailey wrote:
> 
> >
> > I had just translated this bug to the prioritized queue... I kept the
> > logic the same, but I knew it didn't look right!
> >
> > All messages requeued in the past before r17024 (which is to say, a
> > lot of messages, because nodes are busy), are requeued in the reverse
> > order. Statistically, they may be requeued again (and flipped back).
> >
> > With this bug gone (plus the priority queue) the insanely-long- 
> > request-
> > searching has vanished!
> >
> > --
> > Robert Hailey
> 
> 
> I'm excited. If the speed of the simulator after r17025 is any  
> indication of the overall freenet performance, wow...
> 
> Inserts dropped from 28 seconds to 8 seconds (x3.5). Can't really  
> measure requests, though, as they are already so fast in the  
> simulator; but now they don't randomly hang of course.

Fascinating. I'm surprised that it had such a strong effect - how much of this 
is due to prioritising and how much due to queue reversal? With 
prioritisation I'd expect the non-bulk queues to get flushed fairly quickly, 
no?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080112/8823b1cf/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to