On Jan 12, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Maybe we should have a longer timeout on SSKInsertRequest? It's as > big as a > bulk datum, but it's done in a regular request, with (presumably) a > short > timeout ... I don't like the idea of making it stick out on traffic > analysis, > but I don't like the idea of it timing out more often than other > requests > either... We can either move it up to HIGH, or we can have a very long > timeout on SSK inserts??
Rather than moving it from BULK_DATA, I would favor the longer timeout. -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080115/147d7ae9/attachment.html>
