On Jan 23, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 17:43, robert at freenetproject.org wrote:
>> Author: robert
>> Date: 2008-01-23 17:43:11 +0000 (Wed, 23 Jan 2008)
>> New Revision: 17211
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/io/xfer/BlockTransmitter.java
>> Log:
>> actually send the all sent notification
>
> IIRC we don't actually use this atm?
In any event, now it's more debugged. But actually, the
BlockReceiver's packet loss notification is written around getting
this message. Now... in theory the link layer is reliable, so this
should not be used (any packets re-ordered would eventually be
received). And indeed, in my testing of this most of the reordered
packets are eventually received, however, I would also get very-
occasional hangups ("terminating send, we haven't heard from the
receiver in +2m"), which (absent some connectivity issue) would
indicate that the receiver is still waiting for more packets.
So yes... allSent should be redundant with the presence of allReceived
and reliable delivery, but as best as I can tell something is still
afowl... and this appears to have fixed it (or worked-around it in the
case of a link layer bug).
--
Robert Hailey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080123/e22623d2/attachment.html>
