On Thursday 24 January 2008 19:59, Robert Hailey wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Should be done by the caller - can we make sendSync() throw something? > > I don't know, sendSync() is used in a lot of places, and has always > fallen through on timeout. > > Even on edge cases, where the send might still go through, surely at > one minute we are infringing on timing out the other side in all cases.
Well is it reasonable to report backoff here, when it might not be a request? Hmmm maybe it is.. > > -- > Robert Hailey > > > > > > > On Thursday 24 January 2008 18:24, robert at freenetproject.org wrote: > >> Author: robert > >> Date: 2008-01-24 18:24:58 +0000 (Thu, 24 Jan 2008) > >> New Revision: 17236 > >> > >> Modified: > >> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/node/PeerNode.java > >> Log: > >> make sendSync() timeout a backoff cause > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080124/4e5ccc94/attachment.pgp>
