On Jan 24, 2008, at 3:14 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> >> Unless, I suppose, there was an instant when it was the only not- >> backed-off peer; then it would average in real quick. >> >> More plausible since (1) these slow peers show up as NOT backed off, >> and (2) being in this situation makes your peers backoff from you (is >> a request reject more likely then?). > > But the long round trip time will cause it to timeout on Accepted's > and get > backed off, surely? The ping time limits (3s max) are lower than the > timeout > for Accepted, admittedly (5s).
Except that the node is not processing any requests, it is rejecting them all because of the ping time, and I'm not sure how this starts, maybe it is with requests which are not rejected (like announcements). > Are you sure that this was the problem when you got it? No. I'm only sure of the symptoms: (1) sendSync timing out, (2) pInstantReject=100%, (3) SUB_MAX_PING_TIME and MAX_PING_TIME are the highest (presumably-only-current) rejection reasons, (4) no requests being processed, (5) one peer with an outlandish ping time. -- Robert Hailey -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080124/784a7f7c/attachment.html>
