Matthew Toseland wrote: > The node at the end should be close to optimal even if we've redirected near > the beginning, right?
I've probably misunderstood how destination sampling works - is it the case, as in Oskar and Ian's paper, that every node along the path creates a shortcut to the destination with some small probability, or is it only the originator that does so? I was thinking that destination sampling might be harmed if the request took a strange path, even if it ended up in the right place... but to be honest I don't understand it well enough to speculate so I'll shut up. :-) Cheers, Michael
